Objectives
We started by helping our stakeholders define what it would mean for these leaders to be even better than they already were. We drew on data from promotion panels, performance appraisals and discussions with HR and identified the four most common gaps at that level:
- Personal impact – which covered a range of topics including gravitas, assertiveness, confidence and emotional intelligence
- Influence – having a diverse toolkit for securing genuine commitment from team members and key stakeholders
- Team leadership – selling a vision, managing conflicts and developing their people
- Stepping up ‘out of the weeds’ – as in many organisations, some leaders were finding it hard to transition from technical / functional expert into a broader leadership role
We then created a bespoke, experiential programme for groups of 6-12 where every session was designed to challenge, flex and develop participants. They rarely knew what was coming next – an approach that replicated the ambiguity and uncertainty of their working environment – and each session involved a change of pace, energy and focus. There were a number of core tools, tips and techniques – which evolved over the years as the firm and the facilitators evolved – but the majority of these were introduced in response to what happened in the room, rather than being tightly scripted.
One important component of the programme was the effort we put into increasing the “transfer of learning” to the workplace. Keeping things practical helped, as did our deepening knowledge of the firm and the way it operates. In addition, participants were encouraged to enlist the support of their appraiser or sponsor, to hold them to account and help them embed the learning. We supplemented these conversations with ongoing coaching. In the first four year, when the firm was first starting to develop a coaching culture, this was provided by the firm’s growing pool of fully-trained internal coaches. As the ‘coaching culture’ strategy matured, we evolved the programme to train participants to coach each other. Many of these coaching groups continued to meet long after the programme – one even continued when one of the group went on secondment to Australia.
Unlike many leadership programmes, though, ARC paid significant attention to the potential blockers to turning participants’ good intentions into actions. We helped participants tackle the unconscious scripts and habits that were locking them into sub-optimal ways of working and thinking (about themselves and others). This was difficult territory, but it massively increased their chances of breaking those deeply ingrained, unhelpful habits many of them already knew were holding them back
Where possible, we ran the programme using one of the LeaderSpace team partnered with an internal facilitator. All internal facilitators were themselves accredited coaches, trained in the relevant psychometrics, and had experienced the programme as participants.
As with many interventions, we piloted, adapted and customised the programme to different audiences before it was rolled out into new parts of the business or overseas territories. We reviewed and revised the structure and content over the years to keep pace with changes in the firm’s needs, focus and industry, and developments in the world of leadership and team performance.